Skip to content

PoliticsCalifornia5 min read

Bill Maher Blasts California on Education, Green Energy

On 'Real Time', Bill Maher slammed California's struggles in education and green energy, highlighting Mississippi's NAEP gains and Texas's solar lead as "red state" successes.

Share

Topics

Talk show host in a dark purple suit sits at a desk with a city skyline backdrop; left-aligned white text on screen reads: 'Bill Maher Blasts California's Education Results'

Bill Maher slams California Democrats on education and green energy, citing Mississippi NAEP scores and Texas solar gains

Comedian Bill Maher challenged California Democrats on the May 29, 2026 Real Time episode, citing 2024 NAEP snapshots and federal energy data to argue Mississippi outpaced California in Black fourth-grade proficiency and Texas surpassed California in utility-scale solar.

Key takeaways

  • Maher’s central claim: California — despite Democratic control — trails Mississippi on NAEP outcomes for Black fourth-graders and was outproduced by Texas in utility-scale solar generation in 2025.
  • NAEP figures cited: Mississippi’s Black fourth-graders showed higher reading and math proficiency percentages than California in 2024 NAEP state snapshots.
  • Energy data cited: Federal figures show Texas produced more utility-scale solar gigawatt-hours in 2025 than California, prompting questions about permitting and regulatory bottlenecks.
  • Local impact: The segment may sharpen San Diego debates over literacy programs, funding allocation, permitting for solar projects and measurable outcomes.

Key information

Episode and coverage: On the May 29, 2026 episode of Real Time with Bill Maher, Maher targeted California Democrats on “education, race, the environment.” Coverage summarizing his May 29 segment and the NAEP/energy comparisons is available from WFMD and analysis of the energy angle appears in the Washington Examiner.

What Maher said on Real Time

Maher framed a blunt political message: issues Democrats typically own — education, racial equity and the environment — are being lost on measurable outcomes in at least a few key comparisons. He warned that if Democrats cannot deliver results, voters may lose faith.

“Democrats, these are your issues: education, race, the environment … I say this with love: you’re losing to the Waffle House, car-on-the-lawn states.”

Reporters noted Maher repeatedly contrasted California with Mississippi’s NAEP snapshots for Black fourth-graders when making the claim that California’s results were “especially difficult to defend.” Coverage of the remarks is documented by WFMD.

The NAEP numbers Maher referenced

Maher cited figures discussed in a Feb. 9 New York Times analysis of the 2024 NAEP state snapshots. The snapshot numbers widely reported from that analysis show notable gaps for Black fourth-graders:

  • Reading, 4th grade, Black students (2024 NAEP snapshots): Mississippi 19% proficient and 2% advanced; California 7% proficient and 1% advanced.
  • Math, 4th grade, Black students (2024 NAEP snapshots): Mississippi 22% proficient and 2% advanced; California 10% proficient and 1% advanced.

Those snapshot numbers underpin Maher’s “two and a half times as likely” line for reading and his broader argument about Mississippi’s gains relative to spending levels. Reporting that cited these NAEP figures appears in WFMD.

On funding and “return on investment”

Maher’s point: Mississippi’s stronger NAEP outcomes for certain groups come despite much lower education spending than California, challenging the notion that higher per-pupil spending automatically yields better early-grade outcomes. Reporters noted the contrast between California’s high per-pupil spending and comparatively weak NAEP standings for early grades (Hollywood in Toto).

Green energy claims: Texas passing California on utility-scale solar

Maher expanded the critique to energy policy, saying Texas is outpacing California on utility-scale solar — a point Democrats often use to show climate leadership. Reported federal figures show:

  • 2025 utility-scale solar generation: Texas produced 58,634 gigawatt-hours, compared with California’s 53,713 gigawatt-hours (reported in WFMD coverage of Maher’s segment).
  • Reporting from outlets including Inside Climate News and EIA summaries noted Texas passed California in installed utility-scale solar capacity in 2024, although California remains ahead when rooftop and small-scale solar are included.

Maher and other critics point to permitting delays and regulatory hurdles in California as contributing factors for slower large-scale solar build-out (Washington Examiner).

Political framing and reaction

Maher presented the segment as a political warning: if Democrats cannot deliver results on issues central to their platform, voters may lose confidence. He has repeated themes urging Democrats to emphasize measurable outcomes and accountability over rhetoric (Hollywood in Toto; related segments available on YouTube, YouTube and YouTube).

What the public record does not yet show

Full transcripts of the May 29, 2026 Real Time episode are not widely available; reporting relies on excerpts and paraphrase. The New York Times analysis Maher referenced is behind a paywall; secondary accounts provide the key NAEP figures but the full NYT article includes deeper breakdowns useful for attribution and context.

Context worth investigating

NAEP state snapshots show outcomes but do not explain causes. Education researchers point to a range of factors — early literacy policies, teacher coaching, curriculum choices, special education practices, poverty, mobility, and testing rules — that can affect scores over time. Similarly, energy buildout depends on grid capacity, land availability, interconnection timelines and state permitting. For deeper attribution, analysts recommend reviewing multi-year policy and practice changes rather than single-year snapshots.

Sources and reporting on the segment

Implications for San Diego, California

Education

Local effects in San Diego could include:

  • Local political pressure: School-board candidates and voters may press leaders for clear plans to raise early-grade literacy and math proficiency, especially for Black and underserved students.
  • District focus and accountability: San Diego Unified and neighboring districts could face calls to expand tutoring, summer learning, early-literacy programs and teacher supports tied to measurable outcomes.
  • Funding questions: The comparison Maher raised — higher spending in California with weaker results — may trigger debates about whether funds reach the classroom or are consumed by non-classroom costs (facilities, pensions, administration).
  • Community impact: Families and nonprofits may push for targeted interventions, creating openings for expanded tutoring, literacy and early-childhood investments.

Energy and jobs

Potential San Diego implications include:

  • Solar permitting and local development: If statewide permitting is seen as slowing large projects, local jurisdictions may move to streamline permits for rooftop and community solar to boost jobs and capacity.
  • Grid and workforce planning: Pressure to accelerate interconnection upgrades, storage projects and workforce training could grow to capture construction and maintenance opportunities.
  • Political messaging: Officials who campaign on climate may need to emphasize distributed solar gains and clear plans to speed larger projects; opponents could call for permitting reform.

Policy debate and civic conversation

San Diego voters tend to be pragmatic and results-oriented, making local debates likely to respond to clear evidence of success or failure. The Maher segment is expected to sharpen discussion about whether policy choices, not just funding levels, determine outcomes in schools and energy. Civic leaders may be urged to tie goals to measurable timelines, tracked milestones and transparent explanations of barriers — from teacher recruitment to grid upgrades.

Watchlist: Journalists and policymakers in San Diego will monitor whether state and local officials respond to these national comparisons and whether policy or practice changes follow the national debate Maher helped stir.

Share

Topics

More from Jill Norcot

All stories by Jill Norcot